Follow 

Contact

Share

The AMS landscape is evolving rapidly. With the ever-changing nature of technology, older comments can sometimes provide a skewed view to the person seeking feedback. Archived reviews are more than 60 months old, and aren't counted towards the average five star ratings or percent recommended.

Great software but needed extensive customization

Customer Service
5
Does your AMS vendor respond to your organization's requests in a timely and thorough way?
Ease of Use
4
Reliability
3
Customization
4
Membership Size: 
501-1000
Industry Type: 
Government
Organization Type: 
Trade Membership
Primary Job Function: 
Executive Management, Strategic Planning, Governance
Number of Years Using the AMS: 
Less than 1 year

In order to support our robust and complicated membership price rules, reporting needs, board expectations, and committee/community group nuances, we had to do a lot of customizations to the out-of-the-box product in order to succeed. It’s wonderful that the system supports these intense customizations, but sometimes frustrating when changes fail between UAT and production, or when normal work processes are delayed waiting for the buildout of custom objects, roll up fields, and price rules. Overall, the service that we’ve received from the Fonteva team has been great (partially because we’re willing to pop down to their office to talk things out in person!), and I’ve been very grateful to our BAs and support team. It’s been two months of tribulations after go-live, after a long discovery and implementation process, but I see the light at the end of the tunnel with this robust software.